“It’s better to be first than it is to be better,” say Al Ries and Jack Trout in their bestselling book ‘Immutable Laws of Marketing.’
[bctt tweet=”“First mover advantage is a marketing lie-most of the time.”” via=”@Neetibiz”]
[bctt tweet= ““It has stopped millions of entrepreneurs into believing that if they are not the first with a big idea-they are doomed.”” via=”@Neetibiz”]
In 1993, a paper by Peter N. Golder and Gerard J. Tellis described an analysis of 500 brands in 50 product categories that entered new market.
[bctt tweet=”“The first mover brands had 47% failure rate. The follow-up brands had 8% failure rate.”” via=”@Neetibiz”]
First Mover Advantage is not a pretty thing. It is a myth that carries on and on from marketing books and experts. Everybody accepts this as the gospel truth.
History says otherwise:
o Facebook was not the first social network.
o GM did not invent the car.
o Apple never built the first tablet, or MP3 player, or smart phone, or a mouse.
o Microsoft was not the first with most of the things- an operating system, office software, corporate email system, or the console.
o Google did not come up with the first search engine.
o McDonald’s was not the first hamburger restaurant.
o Coca-Cola was not the first soft drink.
o Wal-Mart was not the first supermarket.
There are a hundred more.
[bctt tweet=”“Google, Microsoft, Facebook, Apple- none of these were First Movers.”” via=”@Neetibiz”]
Sony Walkman, Motorola cell phones are a few product innovation examples where the first mover had an advantage for a few years.
Both companies are no longer in those businesses.
There are a few advantages of being a first mover:
• If your product is successful, you get brand recognition in double quick time.
• You can create larger and lasting impression on consumers.
• You can cream the market- in absence of any benchmark or competitive forces, you can price your product high and reap the immediate benefits.
• You also have initial sales advantage.
• You can also manage to sustain this advantage over a period of time.
For example: Gillette’s safety razors, and Sony’s Personal stereos.
But the disadvantages of 1st mover are too many to even merit a discussion.
• There could be a no market –If there was a market, Ten Chinese Companies would already be fighting in that space.
• It is far too expansive – The first mover has to create awareness for their product; create sufficient interest for consumer to try the product and educate him on how to use the product. If you are a small company, these costs can kill you.
[bctt tweet=”“In the long run, the sales advantages are less than the advantages of increased costs.”” via=”@Neetibiz”]
• As a first mover, you need to take care of new government regulations on the category, which can be very time consuming. For example Tesla electric car and Uber taxis.
• You are locked into an old technology and you cannot change it as you are heavily invested in it. All followers can use the new technology, which can give them cost and time advantage.
[bctt tweet=”“The late entrant can learn from the mistakes of pioneer and can save a huge amount of money in trying new things.”” via=”@Neetibiz”]
• Version 1 is never perfect, and as a pioneer, you need to continuously spend money on research & development.
• Real innovators are mostly not good businessman, hence even a breakthrough product may not become a viable business proposition.
A first mover advantage is perhaps a gift for competitive forces, as latecomers or followers may not come with better or more exciting products.
Apple’s stranglehold on the tablet market remains unbroken because Samsung has not figured out a more forceful or meaningful reason for consumers to switch.
Why do followers or copycats win more often?
It’s pretty simple.
[bctt tweet=”“First Movers tend to launch without really fully understanding customer problems or the product features that solve those problems.”” via=”@Neetibiz”]
It also depends on how fast the technology or the market is growing.
What can we learn?
Believing in First Mover Advantage implies that you understand your business model, customers problems and the features needed to solve those problems.
That’s highly unlikely.
Therefore you’re either going to burn through your cash or pray that the hype can help you with quick awareness and sales.
None of the market leaders in technology were the first movers.
Pioneers are always less profitable than No 2 or No 3You need to understand that cost of imitation is 60 % of innovation.
[bctt tweet=”“Smart companies use imitation to gain a strategic edge. Imitation often proves less costly and more effective than innovation.”” via=”@Neetibiz”]
In the long run, innovators get less than 10 % market share.
Balance is taken up by Copycats or imitators.
Hence ,First to market-First to fail.